Axis II Disorders
Personality Disorders
BY: T. Franklin Murphy | September 6, 2022
Definition, history, and arguments for and against the axis-II designation in mental illness diagnosis
Prior to the release of DSM-V, mental diseases were divided into 5 different axis. Listed in Axis II were the personality disorders. DSM began differentiating the mental diseases by axis in DSM-III (1980). According to the APA, the axis designations was to identify disorders, such as the personality disorders, that had received inadequate clinical and research focus. With the release of DSM-V, the APA felt that the personality disorders no longer needed this designation (Grohal, 2013).
Most of the mental disorders are placed on Axis I, whereas the personality disorders (and mental retardation) was placed on Axis II. The Axis system brought increased medical and research attention to these little known personality disorders. With the separation of personality disorders from the Axis I, clinicians began to diagnoses personality disorders. The separation indicated that the Axis II personality disorders were not mutually exclusive from Axis 1 disorders, meaning a clinician could first diagnose an Axis I illness then shift attention to Axis II and identify a possible co-occurring personality disorder (Widiger, 2010). Key Definition:Axis II Disorders were the ten personality disorders listed in DSM-IV. With the release of DSM-V the axis II delineation was removed but the original ten personality disorders remained unedited. Differences Between Personality Disorders and Previous Axis I DisordersEarly research was hindered on personality disorders because of lack of clarity. While early attention to them was able to roughly divide different clustering of behaviors into distinct syndromes of descriptive similarities (Besteiro-González, et al., 2004), the dividing lines from one personality disorder to the the next was blurred.
Robert Hirschfeld, Professor of Psychiatry Weill Cornell Medical College at Cornell University, explains "it is not completely clear from this [DSM III-R] definition [of mental disorder] whether personality disorders are mental disorders because of the requirement that deviant behavior, often the hallmark of personality disorders, cannot be considered a mental disorder unless it is a symptom of dysfunction in the person" (Litvak, 1994). Personality disorders still retain some differences. Personality disorders are not clearly distinct from each other with high comorbidity. The coexistence of several personality disorders makes research difficult, while casting doubt on each personality disorder actually existing as an independent condition. Besteiro-González et al. stated their findings that the personality disorders and their groupings have "a high degree of intercorrelation among DSM PD cluster scores and, in general, variability in cluster groupings were not predictable from self-report measures of the features thought to characterize disorder within clusters" (2004, p, 100). Diagnosing mental illness has never been a perfect science, and this is especially true with the personality disorders. Although, plenty of research has been conducted since the 1980 structure of the multi axel structure, much is still undetermined, requiring further research on diagnosing personality disorders. Defining Mental IllnessesThe Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is now in the revised 5th edition. The DSM is pretty much the bible for diagnosing mental illnesses in the United States. European countries primarily use the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) for defining mental disease on their side of the ocean.
Standard definitions are necessary for research, care standards, and insurance purposes. Communication in technical matters needs clarity. Generally accepted terms allows for clarity and meaningful research. If one university is studying, for example, schizoid personality disorder, their findings can only be replicated or disproven by other research findings if their is an agreement upon the definition of schizoid personality disorder. The smallest deviation in the definition nullify the results for comparison. Please support Flourishing Life Society with a social media share or by visiting a link:
References:Besteiro-González, J., Lemos-Giráldez, S., & Muñiz, J. (2004). Neuropsychological, Psychophysiological, and Personality Assessment of DSM-IV Clusters of Personality Disorders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(2), 99-105.
Grohal, John (2013). DSM-5 Changes: Personality Disorders (Axis II). PsychCentral. 5-29-2013. Accessed 9-4-2022 Litvak, S. (1994/2006). Abrasive personality disorder: Definition and diagnosis. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 24(1), 7-14. Scrimali, T., & Grimaldi, L. (1996). Schizophrenia and Cluster A Personality Disorders. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 10(4), 291-304. Widiger, T. (2010). Cluster A Personality Symptomatology in Youth. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32(4), 551-556. |
|